Sunday, November 1, 2009

Nature-Nurture


Ask anyone about their sexual orientation, and they will most likely say something like, "I was born this way."*

However, demonstrating how such a situation comes about is technically difficult. "Proving"** it is even more problematic. This blog is an ongoing collection of research abstracts related to the complex question of etiology of sexual orientation. Whatever the etiology, it is not solely environmental factors. If it were, everyone would be heterosexual.


_________




"[A]s much as people like to divide themselves into nature or nurture camps, what genes actually do in the brain reflects the interaction between hereditary and environmental information."

"The truth of the matter is that DNA is both inherited and environmentally responsive, and recent findings from animal studies go a long way toward resolving nature versus nurture by upsetting the assumption that the two work differently."

Gene E. Robinson, PhD, Director of the Neuroscience Program at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, in The New York Times op-ed article titled "The Behavior of Genes," published on Dec. 13, 2004


_________


"There are numerous theories about the origins of a person's sexual orientation; most scientists today agree that sexual orientation is most likely the result of a complex interaction of environmental, cognitive and biological factors. In most people, sexual orientation is shaped at an early age. There is also considerable recent evidence to suggest that biology, including genetic or inborn hormonal factors, play a significant role in a person's sexuality. In summary, it is important to recognize that there are probably many reasons for a person's sexual orientation and the reasons may be different for different people."

"APA opposes all public and private discrimination on the basis of actual or perceived gender identity and expression and urges the repeal of discriminatory laws and policies."

More information on APA Policy Statements, as well as other activities and resources, is available at the APA Office of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Concerns.

_________


"No one knows what causes heterosexuality, homosexuality or bisexuality. Homosexuality was once thought to be the result of troubled family dynamics or faulty psychological development. Those assumptions are now understood to have been based on misinformation and prejudice. Currently there is a renewed interest in searching for biological etiologies for homosexuality. However, to date there are no replicated scientific studies supporting any specific biological etiology for homosexuality. Similarly, no specific psychosocial or family dynamic cause for homosexuality has been identified, including histories of childhood sexual abuse. Sexual abuse does not appear to be more prevalent in children who grow up to identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual, than in children who identify as heterosexual." [emphasis mine]

American Psychiatric Association, in "Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Fact Sheet," May 2000


_________


* Heterosexuals are more likely to say something along the lines of, "Of course I am this way. I am normal." This signifies nothing more than the obvious: the process of natural selection inherently favors reproductive success. Heterosexual inclinations favor reproductive success, so genes coding for heterosexual neurobehavioral-development necessarily flourish.

** Proof is confined to mathematics and specially constructed philosophical syllogisms. Within the sciences, the problem of induction renders proof a logical impracticality.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Homophobia statistics

From a university website:

Understanding Homophobia and Heterosexism.

Sexual Prejudice: Motivations.

Demographic Correlates

In contrast to heterosexuals with favorable attitudes toward gay people, those with negative attitudes are more likely to be:
men
older
less well-educated
• residing in geographic areas where negative attitudes represent the norm (for example, rural areas or the Midwestern or Southern United States).

Political and Religious Values

In contrast to heterosexuals with favorable attitudes toward gay people, those with negative attitudes are:
• more likely to attend religious services frequently
• more likely to endorse orthodox religious beliefs, such as the literal truth of the Bible
• more likely to be a Republican than a Democrat or Independent
• more likely to describe themselves as politically conservative, rather than liberal or moderate.

Personality and Attitudinal Characteristics

In contrast to heterosexuals with favorable attitudes toward gay people, those with negative attitudes:
• display higher levels of psychological authoritarianism
• are less sexually permissive
• are more supportive of traditional gender roles.

Perceptions and Experiences of Gay Men and Lesbians

In contrast to heterosexuals with favorable attitudes toward gay people, those with negative attitudes:
• are more likely to believe that a homosexual orientation is freely chosen
• are less likely to have had close personal friends or family members who are openly lesbian or gay.

Homophobia male homosexual arousal

Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal?

J Abnorm Psychol. 1996 Aug;105(3):440-5.

Adams HE, Wright LW Jr, Lohr BA.

The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29); they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992). Both groups exhibited increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies.

Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens 30602-3013, USA.

Homophobic aggression

Homophobia and physical aggression toward homosexual and heterosexual individuals.

J Abnorm Psychol. 2001 Feb;110(1):179-87.

Bernat JA, Calhoun KS, Adams HE, Zeichner A.

This study examined the relationship between homophobia (defined as self-reported negative affect, avoidance, and aggression toward homosexuals) and homosexual aggression. Self-identified heterosexual college men were assigned to homophobic (n = 26) and nonhomophobic (n = 26) groups on the basis of their scores on the Homophobia Scale (HS; L. W. Wright, H. E. Adams, & J. A. Bernat, 1999). Physical aggression was examined by having participants administer shocks to a fictitious opponent during a competitive reaction time (RT) task under the impression that the study was examining the relationship between sexually explicit material and RT. Participants were exposed to a male homosexual erotic videotape, their affective reactions were assessed, and they then competed in the RT task against either a heterosexual or a homosexual opponent. The homophobic group reported significantly more negative affect, anxiety, and anger-hostility after watching the homosexual erotic videotape than did the nonhomophobic group. Additionally, the homophobic group was significantly more aggressive toward the homosexual opponent, but the groups did not differ in aggression toward the heterosexual opponent.

Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-3013, USA. jbernat@egon.psy.uga.edu

Monday, June 1, 2009

Psychology of Homophobia

The psychological basis of homophobia: cultural construction of a barrier.

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2007 Dec;41(3-4):225-47; discussion 326-34.

Madureira AF

The main goals of this article are: (a) to analyze the intricate relations between sexuality, gender, culture and power, and more precisely, the connections between homophobia and sexism; and (b) to analyze the psychological and cultural basis of homophobia and its affective roots. The model of the semiotic regulatory system and the general notion of tension between the two processes (specified by Ernest Boesch)--Heimweh ("homeward road"--striving towards the known and the secure) and the Fernweh ("road to the far away"--adventure, encountering novelty) is used as the theoretical ways to analyze homophobia as a cultural barrier. It is suggested: homophobia is a boundary phenomenon of affective meaning making, a collective historical-cultural construction. Presented in the conclusion are some implications of the promotion of strategies against homophobia in our societies.

Institute of Psychology, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil. afam2001@terra.com.br
.

"Homophobia": a dialogical-semiotic approach.

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2007 Dec;41(3-4):262-71; discussion 326-34.

Gonçalves MM, Machado C

The target article from Madureira--The psychological basis of homophobia: Construction of a cultural barrier--is a very rich theoretical proposal, drawing on from different fields, from cultural psychology to the dialogical theories of the self. Despite its richness, in this commentary we will question some of its implicit and explicit assumptions. It seems to us that the author treats "homophobia" as a hegemonic cultural discourse, ignoring that a mixture of opposing discourses are nowadays available at a cultural level towards lesbians and gays, with important consequences at interpersonal and intrapersonal level. In addition, the very concept of "homophobia" (with its implicit assumptions from the field of psychopathology: "phobia") suggests a very static and intrapersonal way of understanding the diversity of the social mechanisms that underlie sexual prejudice. The way the author describes and tries to clarify the semiotic processes implied in the construction of the interpersonal and psychological barrier involved in "homophobia", in our opinion, also needs to be further developed. The use of the opposition between HEIMWEH and FERNWEH in the explanation of the barrier it is not, from our view, a description of a (semiotic) process but more a description of an outcome. In order to overcome these problems, we suggest some possible ways to approach this phenomenon from a semiotic and dialogical perspective.

Department of Psychology, University do Minho, 4710 Braga, Portugal. mgoncalves@iep.uminho.pt
.